Search for: "ION Trading, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm by Heather Young
DigiBIRD Battery Supplier Found Liable for Fraud, Unfair Trade Practices and Breach of Contract ION Geophysical Corporation (NYSE: IO) today announced that on October 1, 2009, the jury returned a verdict in its favor in a lawsuit filed by ION against operating subsidiaries of battery manufacturer Greatbatch, Inc. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:00 am by Nicholas M. Oertel
Lansing-based XG Sciences, Inc. has launched a new generation of anode materials for lithium-ion batteries with four times the capacity of conventional anodes. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:25 am
In 2006, Sony announced a worldwide recall of 9.6 million laptop batteries that were used in computers made by Toshiba, Dell, Lenovo Group Ltd, and Apple Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:36 am
Green Shades Software, Inc., whereby the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
As with all of our other webinars (including the 10 installments in our 2014 Trade Secrets webinar series), this webinar will be recorded and later uploaded to our Trading Secrets blog to view at your convenience. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Energy smart technologies traded between the United States and China include smart meters, light emitting diodes (LEDs), advanced lithium-ion batteries, and electric vehicles. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:30 pm by Vincent LoTempio
Posted with the permission of the  National Inventors Hall of Fame [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:47 am
”Pix Credit and Timeline HEREIn both cases, the dual circulation policy appears ion more visible form. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
This post is about a recent federal case that addressed this precise issue.It's a civil case: Condux International, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., as courts in at least seven states (including the court below) hold; or, instead, (2) use the rational-factfinder test of Jackson v. [read post]